Sponsored Links
-->

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd - Wikipedia
src: upload.wikimedia.org

Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407 is a case on English contract law and on maritime salvage. It investigates when a common mistake within a contractual agreement will render it void.

It is notable for its disapproval of Solle v Butcher, a Court of Appeal case wherein Lord Denning established a new doctrine of "equitable mistake".


Video Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd



Facts

The defendants, Tsavliris, were professional salvors in the business of maritime salvage and rendering aid to ships in difficulty in the South Indian Ocean. Learning that a vessel named Cape Providence was in trouble, Tsavliris entered into a salvage agreement with the owners on LOF terms. Tsavliris used the Ocean Routes service to try to locate the nearest rescue vessel, and were told that there was one about 35 miles away called the Great Peace. Using London brokers called Marint, Tsavliris contacted the Great Peace's owners, and agreement was made to hire the tug for a minimum of five days. It then became apparent that the Great Peace was not 35 miles from the Cape Providence, but 410 miles. Tsavliris then found a closer tug and terminated the contract with Great Peace Ltd, who responded by suing for gross breach of contract. Tsavliris argued it was a common mistake as to the location of the stricken vessel and this invalidated the contract.


Maps Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd



Judgment

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR held that the mistake was not sufficiently fundamental to void the contract. The Great Peace would have taken 22 hours to do 410 miles, but that delay was insufficient to make performance of the contract 'essentially different from those the parties envisaged when the contract was concluded.'

In the course of the judgment, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission, was approved, and Solle v Butcher was disapproved. It was opined that common mistake could not be explained on the grounds that it is an implied term, although it does apply only when a contract is silent.


learning Business Law in malaysia
src: learningcontract.files.wordpress.com


See also

  • English contract law
  • Frustration in English law
  • Cooper v Phibbs [1867] UKHL 1, (1867) LR 2 HL 149

SAFETY4SEA Cyprus Conference - SAFETY4SEA Events
src: events.safety4sea.com


Notes




References




External links

Source of article : Wikipedia